(Click here for Part 5)
In the fall of 2001 I was a
sophomore college. America was attacked by group of religious
fanatics and the face of the country had changed politically, economically, and
perhaps worst of all, spiritually. Lines
were being drawn as the world’s attention turned to our country and its newly
‘elected’ president. Spring semester
would find me in an introductory philosophy class with the opportunity to study
greats like Kant, Descartes, Socrates and so many others.
At one point the instructor began
a discussion involving the concept and nature of evil. We talked about forms of evil, where it comes
from (or potentially comes from), and how to truly define it. With much of the class being of one Christian
denomination or another, and mostly (if not all) black, a fair amount of the
discussion consisted of either one-way communication (teacher to student) or
one or two students professing the unfettered might of their god and his
goodness; “All I know is god take care of everything”. I didn’t know it then but statements like
these were a solid indication of the inability to reason hypothetically, especially
in the face of Epicurus’ legendary hypothesis.
Is God willing to
prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
I was
quick to point out that none of us had a sufficient answer to this, nor could my
fellow students articulate a reason for their belief (which isn’t to say I had
it all figured out my damn self). They
just believed. It was god. That was it for them. Throughout the discussion I maintained that
evil in and of itself is intrinsic to whatever was viewed as good. Each needs the other; if there’s a god and he
was the standard for good and the devil was the embodiment of evil, then
neither one could or would destroy the other.
They kept each other in business.
That was the gist of my argument anyway.
This earned me more than a few puzzled looks and grumbles. It also led me to make the acquaintance of a
couple of classmates, not necessarily freethinkers, but thinkers all the same. One of whom was a devout Christian who
tirelessly sought to bring me into the fold.
For
anonymity’s sake, we’ll call my friend “Jay”.
Jay was a pretty cool guy out of DC, a real low-key dude who loved golf
and hip hop. He made it abundantly clear
that he was committed to his ‘great commission’ of bringing others to the ‘light
of the cross.’ Strangely it was this
eagerness that prevented me from slamming the door in his face flat out. That
plus I don’t like being a dick. And thus
was the first of many days where we sat and studied the scripture.
Very
interesting conversations ensued, enlightening debates that served us both well
intellectually. I even attended a few
services just to see what all his excitement was about (that and the weekends
could get pretty boring and it was good to have someone to hang with). That
entire time I couldn’t help thinking I was something of a pet project. Perhaps
I was to be his first actual convert.
With each session Jay and I would constantly come to a stalemate, with
him professing his love for ‘the word’ and how he perceived it to work in his life,
while I despite not having read the book nearly enough to point out it’s many
atrocities, simply countered with sheer common sense. The conversation that comes to mind most
often is the one we had over the book of Job.
The story where god and satan make a wager to see how long an innocent
man keep going after receiving one divine screwjob after another, including but
not limited to his slaves, animals, and children being killed (Job 1:13-19).
At that time my knowledge of history,
philosophy and science could have been measured as very little, but it turned
out to be enough in defending my position.
I raised questions, offered counter arguments and didn’t hesitate to
throw out a handful of zingers that were oozing with blasphemy. “I can tell that you don’t respect this”, Jay
once responded. And why should I? I loved the guy to death but did he really think
I would give him a pass? “This book has
the answer to EVERYTHING." What? “We were made from the earth; he took a pile
of dirt and made it something glorious” Huh? ‘Do what I say or burn’… See where I’m going
with this?
Try as
my dear friend might his efforts for conversion proved futile. And it’s not like I didn’t approach this with
an open mind or heart; I chewed on for weeks, came at it from almost every
angle I could at the time, it was just wooden nickels to me. All the same, I understand why he got such a
kick out of it. If the salesman’s got the right rap, seems like a pretty sweet
deal, and it’s “new and hip”, who wouldn’t snag a one way ticket out of
reality.
--Ryan Scales, August 2014



No comments:
Post a Comment